Test Prep CFA® Level 3 Exam Practice Questions (P. 2)
- Full Access (362 questions)
- Six months of Premium Access
- Access to one million comments
- Seamless ChatGPT Integration
- Ability to download PDF files
- Anki Flashcard files for revision
- No Captcha & No AdSense
- Advanced Exam Configuration
Question #11
Many of Mackley's clients are referred to her by Kern & Associates, an accounting and consulting firm. DWM does not provide any direct compensation to Kern &
Associates for the referrals, but Mackley's who is the president of her local CFA Society, invites Kern & Associates to give an annual presentation to the society on the subject of tax planning and minimization strategies that Kern & Associates provides for its clients. Kern & Associates' competitors have never received an invitation to present their services to the society. When Mackley receives a referral, she informs the prospect of the arrangement between DWM and Kern &
Associates.
DWM maintains a full research staff that analyzes and recommends equity and debt investments. All of the in-house research is provided to the firm's portfolio managers and their clients. In addition, DWM provides a subscription service to outside investors and portfolio managers. Aaron Welch, CFA, a private contractor, researches and reports on high-tech firms in the U.S. and other developed countries for several portfolio management clients. One of his latest reports rated
InnerTech Inc., a small startup that develops microscopic surgical devices, as a strong buy. After reviewing the report carefully, Mackley decides to purchase shares of InnerTech for clients with account values over $6 million. She feels that accounts with less than this amount cannot accept the risk level associated with
InnerTech stock.
Two days after purchasing InnerTech for her clients, the stock nearly doubles in value, and the clients are ecstatic about the returns on their portfolios. Several of them give her small bouquets of flowers and boxes of chocolates, which she discloses to her supervisor at DWM. One client even offers her the use of a condo in
Vail, Colorado for two weeks during ski season, if she can reproduce the results next quarter. Mackley graciously thanks her clients and asks that they refer any of their friends and relatives who are in need of asset management services. She provides brochures to a few clients who mention that they have friends who would be interested. The brochure contains a description of Mackley's services and her qualifications. At the end of the brochure, Mackley includes her full name followed by "a Chartered Financial Analyst" in bold font of the same size as her name Following is an excerpt from the brochure:
"DWM can provide many of the investment services you are likely to need. For those services that we do not provide directly, such as estate planning, we have standing relationships with companies that do provide such services. 1 have a long history with DWM, serving as an investment analyst for six years and then in my current capacity as a portfolio manager for twelve years. My clients have been very satisfied with my past performance and will likely be very satisfied with my future performance, which I attribute to my significant investment experience as well as my participation in the CFA Program. I earned the right to use the CFA designation thirteen years ago. All CFA charter-holders must pass a series of three rigorous examinations that cover investment management and research analysis."
Two weeks later, some of Mackley's clients request that she provide supporting documentation for the research report on InnerTech, so they can familiarize themselves with how DWM analyzes investment opportunities. Mackley asks Welch for the documents, but Welch is unable to provide copies of his supporting research since he disposed of them, according to the company's policy, one week after issuing and distributing the report. Mackley informs Welch that obtaining the supporting documents is of the utmost importance, since one of the clients requesting the materials, Craig Adams, is about to inherit S20 million and as a result will be one of the firm's most important clients. Welch agrees to recreate the research documents in order to support the firm's relationship with Adams.
In her marketing brochure, did Mackley violate any CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct in her reference to her investment performance or her reference to the CFA Program?
Performance CFA Program -
- AYes Yes
- BNo Yes
- CYes No
C
Mackley violated Standard V1I(B) Reference to CFA Institute, the CFA Designation, and the CFA Program by linking her future investment performance to her status as a CFA charterholder. Mackley has not, however, violated the standard with her references to the CFA program and the examinations. (Study Session 1,
LOS Lb)

Hi! Do you need help with this question ?
- Why isn't the A the right answer?
- Traducir la pregunta al español
Contributor get free access to an augmented ChatGPT 4 trained with the latest IT Questions.
Question #12
Many of Mackley's clients are referred to her by Kern & Associates, an accounting and consulting firm. DWM does not provide any direct compensation to Kern &
Associates for the referrals, but Mackley's who is the president of her local CFA Society, invites Kern & Associates to give an annual presentation to the society on the subject of tax planning and minimization strategies that Kern & Associates provides for its clients. Kern & Associates' competitors have never received an invitation to present their services to the society. When Mackley receives a referral, she informs the prospect of the arrangement between DWM and Kern &
Associates.
DWM maintains a full research staff that analyzes and recommends equity and debt investments. All of the in-house research is provided to the firm's portfolio managers and their clients. In addition, DWM provides a subscription service to outside investors and portfolio managers. Aaron Welch, CFA, a private contractor, researches and reports on high-tech firms in the U.S. and other developed countries for several portfolio management clients. One of his latest reports rated
InnerTech Inc., a small startup that develops microscopic surgical devices, as a strong buy. After reviewing the report carefully, Mackley decides to purchase shares of InnerTech for clients with account values over $6 million. She feels that accounts with less than this amount cannot accept the risk level associated with
InnerTech stock.
Two days after purchasing InnerTech for her clients, the stock nearly doubles in value, and the clients are ecstatic about the returns on their portfolios. Several of them give her small bouquets of flowers and boxes of chocolates, which she discloses to her supervisor at DWM. One client even offers her the use of a condo in
Vail, Colorado for two weeks during ski season, if she can reproduce the results next quarter. Mackley graciously thanks her clients and asks that they refer any of their friends and relatives who are in need of asset management services. She provides brochures to a few clients who mention that they have friends who would be interested. The brochure contains a description of Mackley's services and her qualifications. At the end of the brochure, Mackley includes her full name followed by "a Chartered Financial Analyst" in bold font of the same size as her name Following is An excerpt from the brochure:
"DWM can provide many of the investment services you are likely to need. For those services that we do not provide directly, such as estate planning, we have standing relationships with companies that do provide such services. 1 have a long history with DWM, serving as an investment analyst for six years and then in my current capacity as a portfolio manager for twelve years. My clients have been very satisfied with my past performance and will likely be very satisfied with my future performance, which I attribute to my significant investment experience as well as my participation in the CFA Program. I earned the right to use the CFA designation thirteen years ago. All CFA charter-holders must pass a series of three rigorous examinations that cover investment management and research analysis."
Two weeks later, some of Mackley's clients request that she provide supporting documentation for the research report on InnerTech, so they can familiarize themselves with how DWM analyzes investment opportunities. Mackley asks Welch for the documents, but Welch is unable to provide copies of his supporting research since he disposed of them, according to the company's policy, one week after issuing and distributing the report. Mackley informs Welch that obtaining the supporting documents is of the utmost importance, since one of the clients requesting the materials, Craig Adams, is about to inherit S20 million and as a result will be one of the firm's most important clients. Welch agrees to recreate the research documents in order to support the firm's relationship with Adams.
In her discussions with Welch, where she asks him to recreate the supporting research for the InnerTech report, has Mackley violated any CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct?
- ANo.
- BYes, because the request creates a conflict of interest between Mackley and Welch.
- CYes, because she failed to preserve the confidentiality of her client's information. C
Explanation
According to Standard 111(E) Preservation of Confidentiality, MackJey has a duty to keep information about her clients confidential, unless it involves illegal activities, in which case she may need to disclose the information to her supervisor, compliance officer, or regulatory authorities as is appropriate. She should not have divulged the inheritance to an outside contractor, especially since that individual has contacts with other management firms. (Study Session 1, LOS l.b)

Hi! Do you need help with this question ?
- Why isn't the A the right answer?
- Traducir la pregunta al español
Contributor get free access to an augmented ChatGPT 4 trained with the latest IT Questions.
Question #13
Pavlica's three children are appalled at their mother's spending habits and have called a meeting with King to discuss their concerns. They inform King that their mother is living too lavishly to leave much for them or Pavlica's grandchildren upon her death. King acknowledges their concerns and informs them that, on top of her ever-increasing spending, Pavlica has recently been diagnosed with a chronic illness. Since the diagnosis could indicate a considerable increase in medical spending, he will need to increase the risk of the portfolio to generate sufficient return to cover the medical bills and spending and still maintain the principal. King restructures the portfolio accordingly and then meets with Pavlica a week later to discuss how he has altered the investment strategy, which was previously revised only three months earlier in their annual meeting.
During the meeting with Pavlica, Kang explains his reasoning tor altering the portfolio allocation but does not mention the meeting with Pavlica's children. Pavlica agrees that it is probably the wisest decision and accepts the new portfolio allocation adding that she will need to tell her children about her illness, so they will understand why her medical spending requirements will increase in the near future. She admits to King that her children have been concerned about her spending. King assures her that the new investments will definitely allow her to maintain her lifestyle and meet her higher medical spending needs.
One of the investments selected by King is a small allocation in a private placement offered to him by a brokerage firm that often makes trades for King's portfolios. The private placement is an equity investment in ShaleCo, a small oil exploration company. In order to make the investment, King sold shares of a publicly traded biotech firm, VNC Technologies. King also held shares of VNC, a fact that he has always disclosed to clients before purchasing VNC for their accounts. An hour before submitting the sell order for the VNC shares in Pavlica's trust account. King placed an order to sell a portion of his position in VNC stock.
By the time Pavlica's order was sent to the trading floor, the price of VNC had risen, allowing Pavlica to sell her shares at a better price than received by King.
Although King elected not to take any shares in the private placement, he purchased positions for several of his clients, for whom the investment was deemed appropriate in terms of the clients* objectives and constraints as well as the existing composition of the portfolios. In response to the investment support, ShaleCo appointed King to their board of directors. Seeing an opportunity to advance his career while also protecting the value of his clients' investments in the company,
King gladly accepted the offer. King decided that since serving on the board of ShaleCo is in his clients' best interest, it is not necessary to disclose the directorship to his clients or his employer.
For his portfolio management services, King charges a fixed percentage fee based on the value of assets under management. All fees charged and other terms of service are disclosed to clients as well as prospects. In the past month, however. Rowan Brothers has instituted an incentive program for its portfolio managers.
Under the program, the firm will award an all-expense-paid vacation to the Cayman islands for any portfolio manager who generates two consecutive quarterly returns for his clients in excess of 10%. King updates his marketing literature to ensure that his prospective clients are fully aware of his compensation arrangements, but he does not contact current clients to make them aware of the newly created performance incentive.
In discussing Pavlica's spending and medical condition with Pavlica's children, did King violate any CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct?
- ANo.
- BYes, because he violated his client's confidentiality.
- CYes, because he created a conflict of interest between himself and his employer.
B
In the meeting with Pavlica's children, King disclosed Pavlica's medical condition. Since King learned this information as a result of his professional relationship with the client, he has a ducy to keep it confidential, even from her children. By breaking the confidentiality, King has violated Standard III(E) Preservation of
Confidentiality. (Study Session 1, LOS l.b)

Hi! Do you need help with this question ?
- Why isn't the A the right answer?
- Traducir la pregunta al español
Contributor get free access to an augmented ChatGPT 4 trained with the latest IT Questions.
Question #14
Pavlica's three children are appalled at their mother's spending habits and have called a meeting with King to discuss their concerns. They inform King that their mother is living too lavishly to leave much for them or Pavlica's grandchildren upon her death. King acknowledges their concerns and informs them that, on top of her ever-increasing spending, Pavlica has recently been diagnosed with a chronic illness. Since the diagnosis could indicate a considerable increase in medical spending, he will need to increase the risk of the portfolio to generate sufficient return to cover the medical bills and spending and still maintain the principal. King restructures the portfolio accordingly and then meets with Pavlica a week later to discuss how he has altered the investment strategy, which was previously revised only three months earlier in their annual meeting.
During the meeting with Pavlica, Kang explains his reasoning tor altering the portfolio allocation but does not mention the meeting with Pavlica's children. Pavlica agrees that it is probably the wisest decision and accepts the new portfolio allocation adding that she will need to tell her children about her illness, so they will understand why her medical spending requirements will increase in the near future. She admits to King that her children have been concerned about her spending. King assures her that the new investments will definitely allow her to maintain her lifestyle and meet her higher medical spending needs.
One of the investments selected by King is a small allocation in a private placement offered to him by a brokerage firm that often makes trades for King's portfolios. The private placement is an equity investment in ShaleCo, a small oil exploration company. In order to make the investment, King sold shares of a publicly traded biotech firm, VNC Technologies. King also held shares of VNC, a fact that he has always disclosed to clients before purchasing VNC for their accounts. An hour before submitting the sell order for the VNC shares in Pavlica's trust account. King placed an order to sell a portion of his position in VNC stock.
By the time Pavlica's order was sent to the trading floor, the price of VNC had risen, allowing Pavlica to sell her shares at a better price than received by King.
Although King elected not to take any shares in the private placement, he purchased positions for several of his clients, for whom the investment was deemed appropriate in terms of the clients* objectives and constraints as well as the existing composition of the portfolios. In response to the investment support, ShaleCo appointed King to their board of directors. Seeing an opportunity to advance his career while also protecting the value of his clients' investments in the company,
King gladly accepted the offer. King decided that since serving on the board of ShaleCo is in his clients' best interest, it is not necessary to disclose the directorship to his clients or his employer.
For his portfolio management services, King charges a fixed percentage fee based on the value of assets under management. All fees charged and other terms of service are disclosed to clients as well as prospects. In the past month, however. Rowan Brothers has instituted an incentive program for its portfolio managers.
Under the program, the firm will award an all-expense-paid vacation to the Cayman islands for any portfolio manager who generates two consecutive quarterly returns for his clients in excess of 10%. King updates his marketing literature to ensure that his prospective clients are fully aware of his compensation arrangements, but he does not contact current clients to make them aware of the newly created performance incentive.
In reallocating the portfolio after the meeting with Pavlica's children, did King violate any CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct?
- AYes, he violated Standard III(A) Loyalty, Prudence, and Care.
- BNo, because he had a reasonable basis for making adjustments to the portfolio.
- CNo, because Pavlica agreed with the investment choices and King has discretion over the portfolio.
A
Since the annual meeting between Pavlica and King was only three months before the meeting between King and Pavlica's children, it is safe to assume the portfolio allocation represented Pavlica's investment policy statement. King reallocated the portfolio before meeting with Pavlica to discuss the suggested strategy and then withheld information that he had met with her children. The reallocation (after meeting with the children) was according to the wishes of Pavlica's children, who are not beneficiaries of the trust. King has a responsibility under Standard 111(A) Loyalry, Prudence and Care to act solely in the best interest of his client and maintain loyalry to Pavlica, not her children. He has thus violated the Standard. (Study Session 1, LOS Lb)

Hi! Do you need help with this question ?
- Why isn't the A the right answer?
- Traducir la pregunta al español
Contributor get free access to an augmented ChatGPT 4 trained with the latest IT Questions.
Question #15
Pavlica's three children are appalled at their mother's spending habits and have called a meeting with King to discuss their concerns. They inform King that their mother is living too lavishly to leave much for them or Pavlica's grandchildren upon her death. King acknowledges their concerns and informs them that, on top of her ever-increasing spending, Pavlica has recently been diagnosed with a chronic illness. Since the diagnosis could indicate a considerable increase in medical spending, he will need to increase the risk of the portfolio to generate sufficient return to cover the medical bills and spending and still maintain the principal. King restructures the portfolio accordingly and then meets with Pavlica a week later to discuss how he has altered the investment strategy, which was previously revised only three months earlier in their annual meeting.
During the meeting with Pavlica, Kang explains his reasoning tor altering the portfolio allocation but does not mention the meeting with Pavlica's children. Pavlica agrees that it is probably the wisest decision and accepts the new portfolio allocation adding that she will need to tell her children about her illness, so they will understand why her medical spending requirements will increase in the near future. She admits to King that her children have been concerned about her spending. King assures her that the new investments will definitely allow her to maintain her lifestyle and meet her higher medical spending needs.
One of the investments selected by King is a small allocation in a private placement offered to him by a brokerage firm that often makes trades for King's portfolios. The private placement is an equity investment in ShaleCo, a small oil exploration company. In order to make the investment, King sold shares of a publicly traded biotech firm, VNC Technologies. King also held shares of VNC, a fact that he has always disclosed to clients before purchasing VNC for their accounts. An hour before submitting the sell order for the VNC shares in Pavlica's trust account. King placed an order to sell a portion of his position in VNC stock.
By the time Pavlica's order was sent to the trading floor, the price of VNC had risen, allowing Pavlica to sell her shares at a better price than received by King.
Although King elected not to take any shares in the private placement, he purchased positions for several of his clients, for whom the investment was deemed appropriate in terms of the clients* objectives and constraints as well as the existing composition of the portfolios. In response to the investment support, ShaleCo appointed King to their board of directors. Seeing an opportunity to advance his career while also protecting the value of his clients' investments in the company,
King gladly accepted the offer. King decided that since serving on the board of ShaleCo is in his clients' best interest, it is not necessary to disclose the directorship to his clients or his employer.
For his portfolio management services, King charges a fixed percentage fee based on the value of assets under management. All fees charged and other terms of service are disclosed to clients as well as prospects. In the past month, however. Rowan Brothers has instituted an incentive program for its portfolio managers.
Under the program, the firm will award an all-expense-paid vacation to the Cayman islands for any portfolio manager who generates two consecutive quarterly returns for his clients in excess of 10%. King updates his marketing literature to ensure that his prospective clients are fully aware of his compensation arrangements, but he does not contact current clients to make them aware of the newly created performance incentive.
In his statements to Pavlica after the reallocation, did King violate any CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct?
- ANo.
- BYes, because he misrepresented the expected performance of the strategy.
- CYes, because he met with her before their annual meeting which is unfair to clients who only meet with King annually.
B
King has essentially guaranteed a certain level of portfolio performance by stating that Pavlica's spending requirements will definitely be met by the new strategy.
This is a violation of Standard J(C) Misrepresentation, which prohibits misrepresentations in dcaJing with clients. The investment strategy has some inherent level of uncertainty and by implicitly guaranteeing performance, King has misrepresented the strategy. (Study Session 1, LOS I.b)

Hi! Do you need help with this question ?
- Why isn't the A the right answer?
- Traducir la pregunta al español
Contributor get free access to an augmented ChatGPT 4 trained with the latest IT Questions.
Question #16
Pavlica's three children are appalled at their mother's spending habits and have called a meeting with King to discuss their concerns. They inform King that their mother is living too lavishly to leave much for them or Pavlica's grandchildren upon her death. King acknowledges their concerns and informs them that, on top of her ever-increasing spending, Pavlica has recently been diagnosed with a chronic illness. Since the diagnosis could indicate a considerable increase in medical spending, he will need to increase the risk of the portfolio to generate sufficient return to cover the medical bills and spending and still maintain the principal. King restructures the portfolio accordingly and then meets with Pavlica a week later to discuss how he has altered the investment strategy, which was previously revised only three months earlier in their annual meeting.
During the meeting with Pavlica, Kang explains his reasoning tor altering the portfolio allocation but does not mention the meeting with Pavlica's children. Pavlica agrees that it is probably the wisest decision and accepts the new portfolio allocation adding that she will need to tell her children about her illness, so they will understand why her medical spending requirements will increase in the near future. She admits to King that her children have been concerned about her spending. King assures her that the new investments will definitely allow her to maintain her lifestyle and meet her higher medical spending needs.
One of the investments selected by King is a small allocation in a private placement offered to him by a brokerage firm that often makes trades for King's portfolios. The private placement is an equity investment in ShaleCo, a small oil exploration company. In order to make the investment, King sold shares of a publicly traded biotech firm, VNC Technologies. King also held shares of VNC, a fact that he has always disclosed to clients before purchasing VNC for their accounts. An hour before submitting the sell order for the VNC shares in Pavlica's trust account. King placed an order to sell a portion of his position in VNC stock.
By the time Pavlica's order was sent to the trading floor, the price of VNC had risen, allowing Pavlica to sell her shares at a better price than received by King.
Although King elected not to take any shares in the private placement, he purchased positions for several of his clients, for whom the investment was deemed appropriate in terms of the clients* objectives and constraints as well as the existing composition of the portfolios. In response to the investment support, ShaleCo appointed King to their board of directors. Seeing an opportunity to advance his career while also protecting the value of his clients' investments in the company,
King gladly accepted the offer. King decided that since serving on the board of ShaleCo is in his clients' best interest, it is not necessary to disclose the directorship to his clients or his employer.
For his portfolio management services, King charges a fixed percentage fee based on the value of assets under management. All fees charged and other terms of service are disclosed to clients as well as prospects. In the past month, however. Rowan Brothers has instituted an incentive program for its portfolio managers.
Under the program, the firm will award an all-expense-paid vacation to the Cayman islands for any portfolio manager who generates two consecutive quarterly returns for his clients in excess of 10%. King updates his marketing literature to ensure that his prospective clients are fully aware of his compensation arrangements, but he does not contact current clients to make them aware of the newly created performance incentive.
Did King's actions with regard to allocating the private placement and the sale of VNC stock violate any CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct?
Private placement VNC sale -
- AYes Yes
- BNo No
- CNo Yes
C
Private placement shares are likely to be illiquid and have more risk than publicly traded equiry. By not taking any shares for himself and only allocating shares to accounts for which the investment is appropriate, King has complied with the Standards. However, King has violated Standard VI (B) Priority of Transactions by trading his shares ahead of his client's shares. It doesn't matter that in this situation it benefited the client. King must always take investment action first for his clients and act in their best interests. (Study Session 1, LOS l.b)

Hi! Do you need help with this question ?
- Why isn't the A the right answer?
- Traducir la pregunta al español
Contributor get free access to an augmented ChatGPT 4 trained with the latest IT Questions.
Question #17
Pavlica's three children are appalled at their mother's spending habits and have called a meeting with King to discuss their concerns. They inform King that their mother is living too lavishly to leave much for them or Pavlica's grandchildren upon her death. King acknowledges their concerns and informs them that, on top of her ever-increasing spending, Pavlica has recently been diagnosed with a chronic illness. Since the diagnosis could indicate a considerable increase in medical spending, he will need to increase the risk of the portfolio to generate sufficient return to cover the medical bills and spending and still maintain the principal. King restructures the portfolio accordingly and then meets with Pavlica a week later to discuss how he has altered the investment strategy, which was previously revised only three months earlier in their annual meeting.
During the meeting with Pavlica, Kang explains his reasoning tor altering the portfolio allocation but does not mention the meeting with Pavlica's children. Pavlica agrees that it is probably the wisest decision and accepts the new portfolio allocation adding that she will need to tell her children about her illness, so they will understand why her medical spending requirements will increase in the near future. She admits to King that her children have been concerned about her spending. King assures her that the new investments will definitely allow her to maintain her lifestyle and meet her higher medical spending needs.
One of the investments selected by King is a small allocation in a private placement offered to him by a brokerage firm that often makes trades for King's portfolios. The private placement is an equity investment in ShaleCo, a small oil exploration company. In order to make the investment, King sold shares of a publicly traded biotech firm, VNC Technologies. King also held shares of VNC, a fact that he has always disclosed to clients before purchasing VNC for their accounts. An hour before submitting the sell order for the VNC shares in Pavlica's trust account. King placed an order to sell a portion of his position in VNC stock.
By the time Pavlica's order was sent to the trading floor, the price of VNC had risen, allowing Pavlica to sell her shares at a better price than received by King.
Although King elected not to take any shares in the private placement, he purchased positions for several of his clients, for whom the investment was deemed appropriate in terms of the clients* objectives and constraints as well as the existing composition of the portfolios. In response to the investment support, ShaleCo appointed King to their board of directors. Seeing an opportunity to advance his career while also protecting the value of his clients' investments in the company,
King gladly accepted the offer. King decided that since serving on the board of ShaleCo is in his clients' best interest, it is not necessary to disclose the directorship to his clients or his employer.
For his portfolio management services, King charges a fixed percentage fee based on the value of assets under management. All fees charged and other terms of service are disclosed to clients as well as prospects. In the past month, however. Rowan Brothers has instituted an incentive program for its portfolio managers.
Under the program, the firm will award an all-expense-paid vacation to the Cayman islands for any portfolio manager who generates two consecutive quarterly returns for his clients in excess of 10%. King updates his marketing literature to ensure that his prospective clients are fully aware of his compensation arrangements, but he does not contact current clients to make them aware of the newly created performance incentive.
According to the CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct, which of the following statements is correct concerning King's directorship with ShaleCo?
- AKing may not accept the directorship since it creates a conflict of interest.
- BKing may accept the directorship as long as it is disclosed to clients and prospects.
- CKing may accept the directorship as long as it is disclosed to his employer, clients, and prospects. C
Explanation
King may accept the directorship even chough it may create a potential conflict of interest as long as the conflict is prominently disclosed in understandable language co all clients and prospects as well as to his employer. According to Standard VI(A) Disclosure of Conflicts, such disclosure is necessary so that all related parties can assess the impact the potential conflict will have on Kings professional acrivities. Additionally, the directorship will provide additional compensation that must be approved ahead of his assuming the position. (Study Session 1, LOS Lb)

Hi! Do you need help with this question ?
- Why isn't the A the right answer?
- Traducir la pregunta al español
Contributor get free access to an augmented ChatGPT 4 trained with the latest IT Questions.
Question #18
Pavlica's three children are appalled at their mother's spending habits and have called a meeting with King to discuss their concerns. They inform King that their mother is living too lavishly to leave much for them or Pavlica's grandchildren upon her death. King acknowledges their concerns and informs them that, on top of her ever-increasing spending, Pavlica has recently been diagnosed with a chronic illness. Since the diagnosis could indicate a considerable increase in medical spending, he will need to increase the risk of the portfolio to generate sufficient return to cover the medical bills and spending and still maintain the principal. King restructures the portfolio accordingly and then meets with Pavlica a week later to discuss how he has altered the investment strategy, which was previously revised only three months earlier in their annual meeting.
During the meeting with Pavlica, Kang explains his reasoning tor altering the portfolio allocation but does not mention the meeting with Pavlica's children. Pavlica agrees that it is probably the wisest decision and accepts the new portfolio allocation adding that she will need to tell her children about her illness, so they will understand why her medical spending requirements will increase in the near future. She admits to King that her children have been concerned about her spending. King assures her that the new investments will definitely allow her to maintain her lifestyle and meet her higher medical spending needs.
One of the investments selected by King is a small allocation in a private placement offered to him by a brokerage firm that often makes trades for King's portfolios. The private placement is an equity investment in ShaleCo, a small oil exploration company. In order to make the investment, King sold shares of a publicly traded biotech firm, VNC Technologies. King also held shares of VNC, a fact that he has always disclosed to clients before purchasing VNC for their accounts. An hour before submitting the sell order for the VNC shares in Pavlica's trust account. King placed an order to sell a portion of his position in VNC stock.
By the time Pavlica's order was sent to the trading floor, the price of VNC had risen, allowing Pavlica to sell her shares at a better price than received by King.
Although King elected not to take any shares in the private placement, he purchased positions for several of his clients, for whom the investment was deemed appropriate in terms of the clients* objectives and constraints as well as the existing composition of the portfolios. In response to the investment support, ShaleCo appointed King to their board of directors. Seeing an opportunity to advance his career while also protecting the value of his clients' investments in the company,
King gladly accepted the offer. King decided that since serving on the board of ShaleCo is in his clients' best interest, it is not necessary to disclose the directorship to his clients or his employer.
For his portfolio management services, King charges a fixed percentage fee based on the value of assets under management. All fees charged and other terms of service are disclosed to clients as well as prospects. In the past month, however. Rowan Brothers has instituted an incentive program for its portfolio managers.
Under the program, the firm will award an all-expense-paid vacation to the Cayman islands for any portfolio manager who generates two consecutive quarterly returns for his clients in excess of 10%. King updates his marketing literature to ensure that his prospective clients are fully aware of his compensation arrangements, but he does not contact current clients to make them aware of the newly created performance incentive.
Does the fee structure at Rowan Brothers and King's disclosure of the compensation structure violate any CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct?
Fee structure Disclosure -
- ANo Yes
- BYes No
- CNo No
A
Standard VI(A) Disclosure of Conflicts. Performance compensation such as the one in effect at Rowan Brothers encourages portfolio managers ro act in their own interests instead of their clients' best interest (a potential conflict of interest) and encourages them to take additional risks to attain the 10% goal. Therefore, this compensation scheme must be totally disclosed to all clients and prospects. By not disclosing the fees to current clients (he only discloses the new fee structure to prospective clients). King has violated the Standard. It is not a violation to have such a compensation program, however, as long as it is disclosed. (Study Session
1, LOS l.b)

Hi! Do you need help with this question ?
- Why isn't the A the right answer?
- Traducir la pregunta al español
Contributor get free access to an augmented ChatGPT 4 trained with the latest IT Questions.
Question #19
Part of the company's operating procedures manual contains detailed information on how the firm allocates shares in oversubscribed stock offerings. Allocation is effected on a pro rata basis based upon factors such as the size of a client's portfolio, suitability, and previous notification to participate in IPOs. Additionally, company policy discloses to clients that any trade needs to meet a minimum transaction size in an effort to control trading costs and to comply with best execution procedures.
One of Bracco's trust accounts is the Carobilo family trust, which contains a portion of nondiscretionary funds managed by Stephen Carobilo. Carobilo has a friend who runs a brokerage firm called First Trades, to which Carobilo tells Bracco to direct trades from the nondiscretionary accounts. Bracco has learned that First
Trades charges a slightly higher trading fee than other brokers providing comparable services, and he discloses this to Carobilo.
Due to high prices and limited supplies of oil, Bracco has been following companies in the energy sector. He believes this area of the economy is in turmoil and should present some mispricing opportunities. One company he has been researching is Stiles Corporation, which is working on a new type of hydrogen fuel cell that uses fusion technology to create energy. To date, no one has been able to successfully sustain a fusion reaction for an extended period of time. Bracco has been in close contact with Stiles' pubic relations department, has toured their laboratories, and has thoroughly researched fusion technology and Stiles' competitors. Bracco is convinced from his research, based upon various public sources, that Stiles is on the verge of perfecting this technology and will be the first firm to bring it to the marketplace. Jerry McNulty, CFA and vice president of the investment banking division of CNL, has been working with Stiles to raise new capital via a secondary offering of Stiles common shares. One day Bracco happened to be in a stall in the bathroom when McNulty and a colleague came in and discussed the fact that Stiles had perfected the fuel-cell technology, which will greatly increase the price of Stiles1 stock.
Stiles Corporation's board of directors includes Dr. Elaine Joachim, who is a physics professor at the University of Toronto. She also works part-time for Stiles
Corporation as a consultant in their fusion technology laboratory. Her husband is a materials engineer who recently started performing consulting work for Stiles.
A routine audit by the quality control department at CNL discovered trading errors in several of Bracco's accounts involving an oversubscribed IPO. Some accounts received shares they should not have and others did not receive shares they should have. Bracco and his supervisor Jaime Gun, CFA, are taking responsibility to reverse the incorrect trades. Bracco told Gun, "I'll correct the trades based on our clients' investment policy statements, previous notification of intent, and according to the company's formula for allocating shares on a pro rata basis. In so doing, we will fairly allocate shares so even small accounts that did not meet minimum size requirements will receive some shares of the IPO." Gun replied to Bracco by saying, "I'll credit short-term interest back to the accounts that should not have received the shares and subtract interest from the accounts that should have received the shares."
That evening, Bracco and his wife attended the company holiday party for CNL employees and their spouses. Jerry McNulty, whose wife was ill and could not come to the party, arrived drunk from a meeting with Stiles' upper management. During the party McNulty made inappropriate advances toward many of the female employees and joked about the inadequacies of Stiles' managers.
Has Bracco violated any soft dollar standards regarding the Carobilo family trust? Bracco has:
- Aviolated soft dollar standards because he did not satisfy the requirement of best execution.
- Bviolated the soft dollar standards because client brokerage is to be used only for research purposes to benefit the client.
- Cnot violated any soft dollar standards since Carobilo directed the trades to a specific broker.
C
Bracco has not violated any soft dollar standards. This is an example of client-directed brokerage where the client, in this case Stephen Carobilo, is allowed to direct the investment manager to use a specific broker to execute trades. Moreover, one could take the view that the client benefits in the sense that Stephen
Carobilo knows he is helping his friend at First Trades Brokerage by utilizing them as the broker. A commingled fund is a fund that is comprised of different client's funds. (Study Session 1, LOS Lb)

Hi! Do you need help with this question ?
- Why isn't the A the right answer?
- Traducir la pregunta al español
Contributor get free access to an augmented ChatGPT 4 trained with the latest IT Questions.
Question #20
Part of the company's operating procedures manual contains detailed information on how the firm allocates shares in oversubscribed stock offerings. Allocation is effected on a pro rata basis based upon factors such as the size of a client's portfolio, suitability, and previous notification to participate in IPOs. Additionally, company policy discloses to clients that any trade needs to meet a minimum transaction size in an effort to control trading costs and to comply with best execution procedures.
One of Bracco's trust accounts is the Carobilo family trust, which contains a portion of nondiscretionary funds managed by Stephen Carobilo. Carobilo has a friend who runs a brokerage firm called First Trades, to which Carobilo tells Bracco to direct trades from the nondiscretionary accounts. Bracco has learned that First
Trades charges a slightly higher trading fee than other brokers providing comparable services, and he discloses this to Carobilo.
Due to high prices and limited supplies of oil, Bracco has been following companies in the energy sector. He believes this area of the economy is in turmoil and should present some mispricing opportunities. One company he has been researching is Stiles Corporation, which is working on a new type of hydrogen fuel cell that uses fusion technology to create energy. To date, no one has been able to successfully sustain a fusion reaction for an extended period of time. Bracco has been in close contact with Stiles' pubic relations department, has toured their laboratories, and has thoroughly researched fusion technology and Stiles' competitors. Bracco is convinced from his research, based upon various public sources, that Stiles is on the verge of perfecting this technology and will be the first firm to bring it to the marketplace. Jerry McNulty, CFA and vice president of the investment banking division of CNL, has been working with Stiles to raise new capital via a secondary offering of Stiles common shares. One day Bracco happened to be in a stall in the bathroom when McNulty and a colleague came in and discussed the fact that Stiles had perfected the fuel-cell technology, which will greatly increase the price of Stiles1 stock.
Stiles Corporation's board of directors includes Dr. Elaine Joachim, who is a physics professor at the University of Toronto. She also works part-time for Stiles
Corporation as a consultant in their fusion technology laboratory. Her husband is a materials engineer who recently started performing consulting work for Stiles.
A routine audit by the quality control department at CNL discovered trading errors in several of Bracco's accounts involving an oversubscribed IPO. Some accounts received shares they should not have and others did not receive shares they should have. Bracco and his supervisor Jaime Gun, CFA, are taking responsibility to reverse the incorrect trades. Bracco told Gun, "I'll correct the trades based on our clients' investment policy statements, previous notification of intent, and according to the company's formula for allocating shares on a pro rata basis. In so doing, we will fairly allocate shares so even small accounts that did not meet minimum size requirements will receive some shares of the IPO." Gun replied to Bracco by saying, "I'll credit short-term interest back to the accounts that should not have received the shares and subtract interest from the accounts that should have received the shares."
That evening, Bracco and his wife attended the company holiday party for CNL employees and their spouses. Jerry McNulty, whose wife was ill and could not come to the party, arrived drunk from a meeting with Stiles' upper management. During the party McNulty made inappropriate advances toward many of the female employees and joked about the inadequacies of Stiles' managers.
If after overhearing McNulty's conversation in the bathroom Bracco placed trades to purchase shares of the Stiles Corporation for some of his clients, would
Bracco have violated any of the Standards of Professional conduct?
- ANo, because the information regarding the Stiles Corporation was not acquired in a breach of confidence.
- BNo, since he performed his own research and is allowed to trade based on the mosaic theory.
- CYes, since he possesses insider information he is not allowed to trade based on this information.
C
Bracco is in violation of Standard 11(A) Material Nonpublic Information, which states that members and candidates cannot trade or cause others to trade based on material nonpublic information that could affect the value of an investment. Even though Bracco has performed his own research and the information he acquired from McNulty and his colleague was an accident, it was nonetheless material nonpublic information and therefore cannot be traded upon. (Study Session 1, LOS l.b)

Hi! Do you need help with this question ?
- Why isn't the A the right answer?
- Traducir la pregunta al español
Contributor get free access to an augmented ChatGPT 4 trained with the latest IT Questions.
All Pages