Juniper JN0-661 Exam Practice Questions (P. 2)

Click the Exhibit button.
[edit] [edit]
lab@r1# show protocols lab@r2# show protocols
ospf3 { ospf3 {
area 0.0.0.0 { area 0.0.0.0 {
interface 1o0.0; interface 1o0.0;
interface ge-1/0/6.0; interface ge-1/0/7.0;
}
}
lo0 = 172.16.100.1/32 [edit]
fc00:1000::1/128 lab@r2# show protocols
ospf3 {
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface 1o0.0;
interface ge-1/1/7.0;
interface ge-1/1/6.0;
}
}
You must ensure that r1's IPv4 loopback address exists in r3's inet 0 routing table.
Referring to the exhibit, which statement is true?

Click the Exhibit button.

Referring to the exhibit, you have a network that uses PIM-SM and you need to block certain PIM register messages.
Which two statements are correct in this situation? (Choose two.)

Which statements are true about NG MVPNs? (Choose two.)

A service provider wants to start using all of their LSPs for internal traffic and not just their MPLS VPNs. Any solution must ensure that existing VPNs and routing policies will continue to function properly.
Which MPLS traffic engineering parameter would accomplish this task?

Click the Exhibit button.
user@router# run show route 2.0.0.0/8
inet.0: 101 destinations, 198 routes (100
active, 0 holddown, 1 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
2.0.0.0/8 *[BGP/170] 00: 12:06, MED
1000, Localpref 100, from 10.220.1.2
As path: 2000 I,
validation-state: unverified
> to 10.220.15.2 via ge-
1/0/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3
to 10.220.12.2 via ge-
1/1/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3
[BGP/170] 00 10, MED
1000, localpref 100, from 10.220.1.5
AS path: 2000 I,
validation-state: unverified
> to 10.220.15.2 via ge-
1/0/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3
to 10.220.12.2 via ge-
1/1/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3
2.6.6.6/32 *[BGP/170] 00:12:06, MED
1000, localpref 100, from 10.220.1.2
AS path: 2000 I,
validation-state: unverified
> to 10.220.15.2 via ge-
1/0/0.0, label-switched-path r1-tor3
to 10.220.12.2 via ge-
1/1/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3
[BGP/170] 00:12:10, MED
1000, localpref 100, from 10.220.1.5
AS path: 2000 I,
validation-state: unverified
> to 10.220.15.2 via ge-
1/0/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3
to 10.220.12.2 via ge-
1/1/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3
user@router# run show route advertising-protocol
bgp 192.168.11.0
inet.0: 101 destinations, 198 routes (100
active, 0 holddown, 1 hidden)
Prefix Nexthop
MED Lclpref AS path
* 2.6.6.6/32 Self
2000 I
[edit protocols bgp]
user@router# show
export reject;
group peer {
export as1000;
neighbor 192.168.11.0 {
family inet {
unicast;
}
peer-as 1000;
}
}
[edit policy-options]
user@router# show
policy-statement as1000 {
term 1 {
from {
route-filter 2.0.0.0/8 longer;
}
then accept;
}
term 2 {
then reject;
}
}
policy-statement reject {
term 1 {
from {
route-filter 2.0.0.0/8 exact;
}
then reject
}
}
You want to advertise routes 2.0.0.0/8 and 2.6.6.6/32 to BGP peer 192.168.11.0.
Referring to the exhibit, which configuration change would satisfy this requirement?