Google Professional Cloud Security Engineer Exam Practice Questions (P. 3)

GPT-4o - Answer

Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP) is spot-on for cases where you need secure and selective access to applications from any location. This holds true for your in-progress sites, ensuring that only specific Google Groups, consisting of your customers and employees, can access these resources. Using IAP, access management is centralized and not bound to specific networks, making it more flexible and secure compared to network-based solutions. Hence, the choice of enabling IAP over other methods results in better control and scalability of access permissions.

GPT-4o - Answer

When considering security with G Suite, a SaaS product, the primary responsibility for network security falls on Google as the provider. Unlike on-premise solutions, where the organization must manage all aspects of network security, G Suite operates under a shared responsibility model where Google takes charge of the infrastructure that includes hardware, software, networking, and facilities. This shifts the focus for organizations from maintaining these controls themselves to ensuring they understand and comply with this shared model. Thus, for the organization concerned about maintaining network security per regulatory requirements when migrating to G Suite, it's crucial to recognize that this aspect is primarily managed by Google.

GPT-4o - Answer

Absolutely, using an organization node with folders for each business unit is the most efficient method here. This strategy not only grants overarching visibility but also allows distinct IAM permissions to be managed effectively across different units. We're essentially leveraging the organizational structure to reflect the company's internal divisions clearly, making it easier to oversee and segregate resources. This setup mirrors a real-world organizational chart into GCP management, ensuring clarity and control.

GPT-4o - Answer

While some users argue different answers, exploring the setup in Google Cloud is crucial from a practical perspective. Even though option D was initially marked correct due to its association with proximity-based routing, it fundamentally applies to HTTP(s) cacheable content, not necessarily emails. Meanwhile, TCP Proxy Load Balancing, as detailed in user comments, does provide global distribution and can route traffic based on the nearest region with backend capacities, which is crucial for reducing latency in email delivery across various regions. Thus, TCP Proxy Load Balancing, presented in Option A, might be more fitting given its broad geographic distribution and its capacity handling characteristics, especially under the Premium Tier.