VMware 5V0-22.23 Exam Practice Questions (P. 1)
- Full Access (76 questions)
- Six months of Premium Access
- Access to one million comments
- Seamless ChatGPT Integration
- Ability to download PDF files
- Anki Flashcard files for revision
- No Captcha & No AdSense
- Advanced Exam Configuration
Question #1
A vSAN administrator has a group of requirements from the application team, which mandates spreading the components across storage devices as much as possible.
What should the vSAN Administrator consider to achieve such a requirement for building a new vSAN cluster? (Choose two.)
What should the vSAN Administrator consider to achieve such a requirement for building a new vSAN cluster? (Choose two.)
- AConfigure disk striping in OSAMost Voted
- BConfigure disk striping in ESAMost Voted
- CEnable Force Provisioning in OSA
- DEnable deduplication for vSAN
- ECreate a dedicated Storage Pool in ESA
Correct Answer:
AD
AD

Analyzing the purpose of enhancing component spread across storage devices within a vSAN environment, Options A (Configure disk striping in OSA) and D (Enable deduplication for vSAN) from the provided answers initially seem appropriate. However, user comment 1 correctly points out that deduplication (Answer D) does not affect the spread of components but focuses on space efficiency by eliminating redundant data blocks. True component spread is directly achieved through disk striping, as indicated in Option A, fitting the requirement to distribute data across multiple physical devices convincingly. Thus, it could be argued that A could be the more accurate response if focusing strictly on spreading components, debunking the suitability of D in this context.
send
light_mode
delete
Question #2
A site administrator wishes to implement HCI mesh between two clusters on vSAN that are located in geographically separate sites and which are administered within a single datacenter.
Which two requirements should the vSAN administrator consider to accomplish this goal? (Choose two.)
Which two requirements should the vSAN administrator consider to accomplish this goal? (Choose two.)
- AEither Layer 2 or Layer 3 communications can be usedMost Voted
- BA leaf spine topology is required for core redundancy and reduced latency
- CNIC teaming must be implemented for the vSAN network vmkernel port
- DThe configuration must meet the same latency and bandwidth requirement as local vSANMost Voted
- EEncryption must be disabled prior to configuring HCI mesh
Correct Answer:
AD
AD

For successfully setting up HCI mesh between geographically separated vSAN clusters, it is vital to focus on network requirements. Firstly, the network can be configured using either Layer 2 or Layer 3 communications, adaptable to the existing network infrastructure. Secondly, ensuring that both latency and bandwidth are on par with those of a local vSAN setup is crucial. This equivalence is essential to maintaining efficient data synchronization and storage operations across the clusters. Thus, prioritizing these network specifications will ensure a robust and functional HCI mesh environment.
send
light_mode
delete
Question #3
An administrator has 24 physical servers that need to be configured with vSAN. The administrator needs to ensure that a single rack failure is not going to affect the data availability. The number of racks used should be minimized.
What has to be done and configured to achieve this goal?
What has to be done and configured to achieve this goal?
- ADistribute servers across at least two different racks and configure two fault domains
- BConfigure disk groups with a minimum of four capacity disks in each server and distribute them across four racks
- CEnable deduplication and compression
- DDistribute servers across at least three different racks and configure three fault domainsMost Voted
Correct Answer:
A
A

The correct approach to ensuring vSAN data availability while managing rack distribution effectively is to use two fault domains across two different racks. This configuration provides resilience against a single rack failure without necessitating additional racks, aligning perfectly with the requirement to minimize rack use. While configuring three fault domains across three racks, as suggested in some responses, does enhance fault tolerance, it does not meet the explicit goal of minimizing rack count. Therefore, for a scenario where only one rack failure needs to be tolerated, two racks are adequate.
send
light_mode
delete
Question #4
An administrator wants to assign a storage policy to a workload on a two-node vSAN OSA cluster consisting of three disk groups each with nested fault domains. The virtual machine must be protected against a disk or disk group failure.
Which two storage policies meet these requirements? (Choose two.)
Which two storage policies meet these requirements? (Choose two.)
- ARAID-5/FTT 2
- BRAID-1/FTT 3
- CRAID-6/FTT 2
- DRAID-5/FTT 1Most Voted
- ERAID-1/FTT 1Most Voted
Correct Answer:
DE
DE

The correct choice to ensure protection against disk or disk group failure in a 2-node vSAN cluster with three disk groups is RAID-1/FTT 1. This setup directly mirrors data between nodes, which aligns perfectly with the available fault domains. While RAID-5/FTT 1 could technically be considered under certain conditions, it usually requires at least four disk groups to be feasible and effectively implement nested fault domains. Consequently, RAID-1/FTT 1 is the most straightforward and feasible option, ensuring full data redundancy across the available hardware. RAID-6 and RAID-5 configurations with higher FTT settings are not viable in this specific 2-node cluster setup.
send
light_mode
delete
Question #5
A vSAN administrator is noticing that the objects resynchronizing in the cluster are taking longer than expected and wants to view the resynchronizing metrics.
Which performance category should the vSAN administrator open?
Which performance category should the vSAN administrator open?
- ADisks
- BHost Network
- CResync Latency
- DBackendMost Voted
Correct Answer:
D
D

To view resynchronizing metrics in a vSAN cluster, the administrator must choose the "Backend" performance category. This category specifically provides key resynchronization details such as Read IOPS, Read Throughput, and Read Latency, crucial for troubleshooting and monitoring resynchronization activities within the cluster. While Resync Latency might sound appropriate, it is not a standalone category available for selection; instead, it falls under critical metrics found within the Backend category. This categorization ensures comprehensive reporting and analysis of backend operations affecting cluster performance.
send
light_mode
delete
All Pages